wait.
Whitaker says he will not appear before House panel unless he gets guarantee he won't face a subpoena.
um, well, if he doesn't not appear, and they have to subpoena him, that forces him to testify and answer questions, right? so i'm not getting this.
he wants a promise that he will not get a subpoena. so he's going to show, and testify truthfully (bwhahahah for the Chump administration). as long as he's not subpoenaed to do exactly that.
so if he does get a subpoena and he doesn't show - then he's in contempt. right?
always convoluted, this government.
Whitaker says he will not appear before House panel unless he gets guarantee he won't face a subpoena.
um, well, if he doesn't not appear, and they have to subpoena him, that forces him to testify and answer questions, right? so i'm not getting this.
he wants a promise that he will not get a subpoena. so he's going to show, and testify truthfully (bwhahahah for the Chump administration). as long as he's not subpoenaed to do exactly that.
so if he does get a subpoena and he doesn't show - then he's in contempt. right?
always convoluted, this government.
No comments:
Post a Comment